
The Just Peace Agreement has been created by thinking outside the box. The box in this case is the long-running cycle of terrorism and reprisal and half-hearted negotiations that drag on for decades between participants whose hands are tied by the very problems they are trying to solve, leading to agreements that are barely implemented or not implemented at all.
Some of the results of thinking outside the box are unfolded in the next paragraphs...
In the Just Peace Agreement we break out of this zero-sum game, creating a new situation in which a gain for one party is a gain for the other. Both Israel and Palestine benefit from every step. Whatever Palestine gains in territory, security, development, prosperity and power helps to remove the causes of violence and so makes Israel more secure and prosperous too. Every gain for Israel is balanced by a comparable gain for Palestine, making it overwhelming attractive to all Palestinians to sign up for a non-violent future under the Just Peace Agreement.
The agreement is not tied into a zero-sum game because of the next principle...
For instance, everyone assumes it is impossible to create the State of Palestine with the same area of territory as the State of Israel. But, thinking outside the box, the Just Peace Agreement asks Egypt and Saudi Arabia (helped a little by Jordan, Syria and Israel, and other Arab states who want join in) to donate territory to Palestine and make the two states the same size.
The same principle is applied in the much more important matter of development, with the aim of bringing Palestine to the same level as Israel in prosperity, employment, and every other measure of economic, social, environmental and cultural attainment, within two decades. Yet amazingly the Just Peace Agreement does not ask anything of any country in the world that they cannot easily afford and will not be willing to contribute to the overall peace package.
Israeli and Palestinian politicians could never have come up with a solution to their conflict
so ambitious, so complete and so audacious, however long they talked...
As a result, the Just Peace Agreement is strictly independent, neutral and balanced, even if some people say it is not. Our aim in writing this treaty has been to make a way that leads straight, rapidly and practically to two equal states living side by side in complete peace, security and growing prosperity and co-operation, with balanced rights and powers, and surrounded by countries who are at peace with both of them. Only people from outside the region, with nothing to gain from it, could have the audacity to ask everyone in the world to contribute in the way that we do in this agreement.
The Just Peace Agreement always looks for the positive solution that is not destructive,
but is constructive...
So the plan must be attractive and yet must be deliverable. It is a dream which has to come true in reality.
The agreement promises a just peace and is carefully crafted to make its promise
affordable and deliverable in practice. But is this justice?
This is not justice based on restoration. Still less is it justice based on retribution. It was never going to be possible to restore to everyone what they had lost; that would be unjust to those on the other side who would lose what they had fought for and built. And instead of retribution, the Just Peace Agreement implements a total amnesty on both sides, drawing a "line in time" under all previous offences and wrongs, so that everyone can start afresh.
Parity is not just one of the principles used by the authors of the JPA in writing the treaty; it is written into the treaty itself, and applied in every article to ensure just treatment and equality of the two peoples.
Parity is one key unusual principle of the Just Peace Agreement, but not the only one.
The way the agreement will be implemented is also unique...
As soon as one of the principal parties decides they want to see the Just Peace Agreement implemented, they can adopt it, which means they publicly state their intention to implement it. Then they start to implement the parts of the agreement that are their responsibility, even before the opposite party does so and before the agreement is formally signed. This builds credibility in them and their commitment to the agreement in advance of signing.
When all the parties join in the early stages of implementation, which are sequenced by an international representative, they can go ahead and sign the agreement. Later stages of implementation over the following fifteen years are guided by an inter-governmental committee set up under the agreement, the Israel-Palestinian Co-operation Committee, and its many subcommittees.
Even those parts of the implementation that will take time are fast tracked. The economic development program to parity is scheduled over just fifteen years, driven by robust financial support from the international community, on-the-job training by international experts, and the ambitious timetable for resettlement of Palestinian refugees.
The agreement is yours, and its implementation...